Metro Considering Service Cuts

Hardly a day goes by when one does not hear more grim news about the deteriorating national economy. According to Mayor Euille’s State of the City Address on February 26, Alexandria had to slash $10M from its FY09 budget and is planning to cut its planned FY10 budget by $44M and cut 121 positions (many of them vacant, but 20+ City employees will be receiving pink slips soon) just to maintain the current level of City services, including, but not limited to, fire and EMS, beautification programs, and the City’s annual contribution Metro funding.

Anyone who has lived and commuted in the Greater Washington, DC area via metro bus/rail knows that metro is underfunded and overworked. Not only is the system nearing capacity, but it is rapidly approaching the end of its physical life cycle. (Fortunately a massive capital improvement project has been underway since 2008 to upgrade its infrastructure to offset the deterioration). The Metro system is facing a whopping $154M deficit and officials are considering cutting eliminating its 3 AM rail service on weekends, closing weekday stations at 10 PM, and cutting all local bus routes (bus routes that begin and terminate within a single jurisdiction, i.e. a bus that does not cross any municipal/county/state borders).

Even though First Vice Chair Peter Benjamin said, “The last thing we really want to do is cut service…We do any service reductions only if we can’t see any other reasonable way out,” why hasn’t Metro sought to increase off-peak ridership or advertisements extolling the virtues of riding Metrorail/bus instead of going by car? Gas prices will spike again.

One of my colleagues was a guide at the Inauguration and he mentioned how many tourists could not identify metro from the street. The drab, brown columns on the sidewalks don’t exactly jump out at you. He said one of those intrepid tourists asked him where the nearest metro station was while he was leaning on the metro column itself. Why doesn’t Metro repaint them in bright, bold colors to attract additional attention and double-down with an aggressive advertising campaign urging residents and commuters to use Metro more often to generate additional revenue? Although cutting service on metro may allow the agency to bridge its project deficit for FY10, it will encourage its users to rely increasingly on personal vehicles, which will numb economic activity in the jurisdictions it serves.

How many restaurants in Alexandria will suffer in Metro decides to close at 10 on weekdays when a couple wanting to escape from Washington for the night for a relaxing dinner by the waterfront elects to stay in? How many young professionals will the City lose if the Metro forces them to choose between the vibrancy of DC and the community-orientated Alexandria. Already too many people believe that “Taking transit is not convenient for their jobs” – it would be a shame if that number increases even further.

Unless it begins to aggressively promote itself, Metro could find itself with less service, fewer riders, and jurisdictions less willing to fund the system.

This entry was posted in transportation. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Metro Considering Service Cuts

  1. Problem is two-fold.

    1) over half the people on the metro board including our beloved mayor Euille do not take metro. So how can a board make cuts or additions to service if they do not use it themselves? They can’t.

    2) City planners, not only in Alexandria, but in most jurisdictions have no idea what they are doing. Alexandria is trying to model itself after Portland, OR which has been planning disaster. Before the planning remodel of Portland, more people took alternate forms of transportation (light rail, bikes, etc), now that percentage is down by 20%. Far from relieving congestion or getting people to stop driving, Portlanders are so angry at the congestion and other problems resulting from the City planners that they have repeatedly voted against light rail and other projects.

    Instead of planning around the auto, city planners MUST begin planning around transit (buses and rail). What MUST not happen is to have excess growrth “smart growth” around Metro stations like in my neighborhood of Carlyle.

    Around the country, “smart growth” planning has resulted in unaffordable housing, which is one of the main reasons behind the current housing problems, more traffic, higher taxes, and increased crime. We are starting to see that in Carlyle and God forbid it doesn’t come to your neighborhood.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s